Ananth Sankaralingam, Akshay Mistry
Founded: 2026. Incorporated/registered entity: Chromie.dev, Inc. Entity type: California stock corporation. California filing date: August 6, 2026. California document number: B20260359375. Formed in: Delaware. Status: Active. Principal address: San Francisco, California. Registered agent: Telos Legal Corp. Registration information is reported by Bizprofile.net from California Secretary of State registry data; no separate Delaware file number was publicly identified.
-
-
Company Brain — Structures company profiles, capabilities, documents, past performance, and team knowledge into reusable verified context., Discover — Continuously monitors federal and SLED procurement sources and fit-scores opportunities against company capabilities., Recompete Radar — Uses contract expirations, incumbent information, and agency budget signals to identify potential recompetes before public solicitation., Capture — Extracts requirements, evaluation criteria, deadlines, set-asides, and capability gaps from solicitations., Pipeline — Tracks pursuits from opportunity identification through submission and award outcomes., Teaming and Pricing — Supports subcontractor matching, labor mapping, teaming strategies, and bid pricing analysis., Proposal Generation — Produces first-pass proposal drafts based on solicitation requirements and company knowledge.
Founder LinkedIn:
Ananth Sankaralingam: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ananth-s
Akshay Mistry: https://www.linkedin.com/in/akshaymistry-
Founded: 2026
Incorporated: Chromie.dev, Inc.; California filing dated August 6, 2026
Status: Active
Funding history: Backed by Y Combinator, Summer 2026 batch
Funding amount: Not publicly disclosed
Acquisition: None publicly disclosed
Operating traction: Supports contractors associated with 100+ prime awards and more than $250M in obligated contract value; reported 3x monthly proposal output for participating teams.
Product evolution: Earlier 2026 public materials described a deterministic browser-agent and Chrome-extension platform; current official positioning is government-contracting workflow software.
Problem Statement
Manual portals + fragmented data + institutional knowledge loss -> slow qualification and inconsistent bids.
No solution -> missed opportunities, wasted proposal labor, weaker positioning, and lower win probability.
Alternatives -> SAM.gov and state portals, spreadsheets, consultants, incumbent GovCon intelligence platforms, and internal BD/capture teams.
UNIT METRICS (to be removed later)
-----------------------------------
Unit Metric | Number
Prime Awards Supported | 100+
Obligated Value | $250M+
Proposal Output | 3x
Team Size | 2
YC Batch Year | 2026
Revenue | N/D
Gross Margin | N/D
CAC Payback | N/D
Win Rate | N/D
Inference Cost | N/D
Due Diligence Segment
---------------------
Market & Sector Thesis: Government contractors operate in a large, data-heavy market where opportunity discovery, capture, proposal, and institutional knowledge remain fragmented. AI-native workflow software can improve bid-selection speed and proposal throughput, but accuracy, traceability, security, and domain expertise are critical adoption requirements.
Market Sizing: YC cites approximately $800B in annual U.S. government contract spending; Chromie's specific SAM and SOM are not publicly disclosed.
Operating Traction: Publicly reported traction includes 100+ prime awards supported, over $250M in obligated contract value, 3x monthly proposal output, multiple users, and federal plus state/local customers.
Direct Competition: GovDash, GovTribe, HigherGov, and GovWin IQ/Deltek; all operate in the U.S. government-contracting intelligence, capture, proposal, or workflow-software market. Competitor employee counts and comparable company-stage data were not consistently publicly disclosed.
MOAT Durability: Potential advantages include a structured Company Brain, traceable solicitation intelligence, proprietary pursuit data, government-domain workflows, and feedback from award outcomes. The moat could weaken if larger GovCon platforms replicate the workflow, if foundation-model vendors commoditize extraction and proposal generation, or if customers do not contribute enough proprietary data to improve outcomes.
Plausible probable AI models used: Specific model names are not publicly disclosed. Verified technology claims include AI-assisted solicitation extraction, fit scoring, PWin models backtested against millions of verified award outcomes, and deterministic tooling for workflow execution.
Tech used underneath: SAM.gov and SLED procurement-source monitoring; deterministic tooling; solicitation document parsing; structured requirement extraction; fit scoring; PWin modeling; audit-trace and source mapping. Specific cloud, database, orchestration, and foundation-model vendors were not publicly disclosed.
Sources:
Official website — https://www.chromie.dev/ — accessed August 25, 2026
Y Combinator company profile — https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/chromie — accessed August 25, 2026
Official LinkedIn company page — https://www.linkedin.com/company/chromie-dev/ — accessed August 25, 2026
California registration listing — https://www.bizprofile.net/ca/san-francisco/chromie-dev-inc — updated August 11, 2026
GovDash — https://www.govdash.com/ — accessed August 25, 2026
GovTribe — https://govtribe.com/ — accessed August 25, 2026
HigherGov — https://www.highergov.com/ — accessed August 25, 2026
| Attribute | Metric | Reference | Company Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capitalization | Seed Funding | 5-6 USD million | - |
| Capitalization | Series A Funding | 18-26 USD million | - |
| Commercial Traction | Annual Revenue Growth | 3-5 % or X | - |
| Commercial Traction | Countries Served | 40-80 countries | - |
| Commercial Traction | Customer Count | 235-1000 customers | - |
| Commercial Traction | Customer Organizations | 4000 organizations | - |
| Early Financing | Seed Round Size | 4-5 USD million | - |
| Early Financing | Series A Size | 20 USD million | - |
| Enterprise Readiness | ISO 27001 | 1 certifications | - |
| Enterprise Readiness | SOC 2 Type II | 1 certifications | - |
| Operational Scale | Contracts Processed | 500000-1000000 contracts processed | - |
| Operational Scale | Countries Served | 70-80 countries | - |
| Product Efficiency | Review Time Reduction | 50-90 % | - |
| Product Efficiency | Review Turnaround | 4-24 hours | - |